My roommate Ben is an illustrator, DJ and all around smarty pants who frequently challenges me to bigger and better thinking over pumpkin pancakes and coffee. We live on Pluto, an apartment not quite the size of a planet but bigger than your average space rock, and during one such cosmic conversation I whipped out GarageBand to get some of our words on (digital) file. This was a LONG conversation, with some parts relevant to this blog and other parts splintering off into the personal realm of letter-writing and young loves lost. This particular excerpt concerns appearances versus reality, facebook as a digital gallery and the new American highway. The recording entered as we were discussing the democratization of the photographic art form through the move from film photography to digital photography.
Ben: Where do you end up seeing lots of pictures people take? On facebook. Facebook is really a photographic extender. It’s a place where all your digital pictures can be shown and live. Facebook is more an extention of a digital camera than…
Rhonda: the gallery?
B: Sure. Yeah.
R: I mean, that’s where the impact of digital photography is going to be felt more. Is on the internet.
B: On social networking sites. Everyone’s got a little camera. So where are you going to put all these pictures you just took?
R: You used a phrase earlier that I really liked: “your own personal curated gallery of your life.” Which is essentially what facebook is.
B: So I’m saying, in my personal experience, there’s someone I’m checking out, for whatever reason, because you’re going to sniff out people on facebook, you’re just going to do it, even though its a joke, if you’re using facebook, its going to happen. You might not know them at all, but you want to check them out. Before you click on their info tab to see what this person’s into, you’re looking at their picture. Facebook is oriented to look at people’s pictures first before you read anything about them. Its very image based.
R: Are you talking about people’s profile pictures or pictures people are tagged in? Because I’m very interested in thinking about the images people choose to represent themselves; the images that they actively choose or crop or edit in whatever way to be their representative photo to the facebook universe.
B: Oh that’s interesting. But you can still control what photos you are tagged in. I’m talking about how I feel like my opinion of someone-not that I’m judging them…
R: Sure you are.
B: I’m looking to see if this person has refined aesthetic taste and cares about someone else’s experience looking through their photographs on facebook. If I see 600 bad pictures of people at the bar or at a party or on vacation in the Bahamas... its generic. People can make their life look like a cliché. It's not curated, they’re not trying to give you an experience as a viewer. Their just dumping their entire hard drive onto facebook.
R: There’s no sense of refining or editing.
B: And I feel like that’s really inconsiderate to do that. Not inconsiderate in the sense of “you hurt my feelings” but just in that they did not consider the experience someone’s going to have when they flip through this. They’re just filling the internet with trash. I think about the way you organize your bedroom. It can be clutter, or it can be a nice collection of these things that mean something to you. I take it really seriously.
R: As do I!
B: Which is funny though because I end up wondering why I’m taking something that exists on facebook this seriously at all?
R: Because it’s an intentional choice. It’s a reflection of that person.
B: But it isn’t!
R: I mean, its not a reflection of that person’s soul, or anything deep and earnest that you would learn from getting to know them, but what I’m interested in are the choices that people make in creating this projection of themselves. And those are choices of words in how they describe their interests, choices of imagery and aesthetics that they use. These are active choices, and that tells you something.
B: Yes definitely. There is this kid I met up with in person after getting to know him on Tumblr, which is this simplified blogging site. Have you heard of it?
R: No.
B: It’s really awesome. You can use it for whatever you want but the way I use it is to scroll through pictures people collect for their individual pages. Its just a really minimal version of blogging. So I really like this guy’s Tumblr page, he picked the most insane pictures. A lot of them were video grabs, shit from commercials, really weird stuff but always really engaging to me. And he liked my drawings and even re-blogged some of my work. So we had a back and forth communication and he was in Chicago visiting his dad and got in touch with me to ask if I wanted to meet up. I was like, well sure! Why not? But I had expectations to really like this person.
R: Because you really liked his aesthetic.
B: Because I REALLY liked his aesthetic. His aesthetic spoke to me a lot.
R: And what happened?
B: He was just kind of a shy, early twenty something, just graduated, sociology major.
R: He wasn’t a particularly interesting person?
B: Maybe he is, but THAT NIGHT, he wasn’t interesting at all. I mean he was curious, in his oddness, and he drew a really weird picture in my sketchbook which was really awesome. So I enjoyed his company but it wasn’t the experience that I had from his images. While his images really spoke to me and made me feel like I was on board with him completely, in person he could have been just any other kid. It kind of felt like hanging out with someone’s younger brother. Like, “hey dude, do me this favor and hang out with my kid brother.” Not having anything in common with him. It was weird.
R: So something that sparked on the internet fizzled in real life.
B: I mean I still like his pictures, but I have zero investment in him as an individual after that experience. Maybe before I projected my feelings from those images that I value so much onto the person. And that was a mistake. That’s why I don’t think its good to do that with facebook, because facebook may be this extension of ourselves, our curated collection, but it doesn’t really tell you a whole lot about the experience of physically being with that person.
R: Is that the only interaction you’ve had like that?
B: All my relationships have had some sort of internet assistance.
R: Yeah, that’s just called modern life. I mean one that began on the internet and then transitioned into real life?
B: Yeah that was the only one. Its funny because I always expected to do it with a girl first, its funny that the first person I met on the internet through common interests was a guy.
R: And it had no sexual undertones at all.
B: It did though! Only because the only experience I expected to have like this was a sexual one.
R: [Laughs]
B: And so I went into it wondering if he was going to hit on me or something. I think meeting a could-be friend on the internet has the same feeling as picking up a hitchhiker of the side of the road. He COULD be a pervert. And I think that the internet’s the new American highway. Everyone’s says don’t talk to strangers in real life, and that mentality just transitions to the computer.